Thinking differently about powerful knowledge in English Education

Submitted by: Victoria Elliott
Abstract: Discourses of ‘powerful knowledge’ (Young, 2013) have proliferated in secondary education in recent years. Without delving too deeply, powerful knowledge in this framework is knowledge which brings an advantage in being learned: it is not the knowledge of the powerful, but it is largely seen in terms of traditional, significant scientific (in the broadest sense) knowledge. In this symposium we will offer various takes on powerful knowledge: one paper shows that the version of powerful knowledge most commonly in play in English classrooms in England, cultural literacy (usually mislabelled as cultural capital (Elliott, 2020)) is the knowledge of the powerful, rather than powerful knowledge (Dingwall). Another paper considers the ‘powerful knowledge’ of canonical literature through the lens of race and empire, arguing that there is power here in the contextual knowledge as much or more than in the canonical (Elliott). A third paper looks at a different kind of powerful knowledge developed in the L1 classroom: empathetic acceptance of others, and self-acceptance (Riser). In conversation these papers produce alternative models of power in terms of the development of students through the L1 curriculum, which speak strongly to the pursuit of social justice through education. They offer ways to engage in the English/L1 classroom that both critique and extend the Young model of powerful knowledge, to the benefit of students and teachers.

Elliott, V. (2020) Knowledge in English: Canon, Curriculum & Cultural Capital. Abingdon: Routledge/NATE.
Young, M. (2013). Overcoming the crisis in curriculum theory: A knowledge-based approach. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45(2), 101–108