Changing perspectives on self and others in the literature classroom

Submitted by: Marloes Schrijvers
Abstract: Researchers and philosophers alike suggest that reading literature may change us for the better. It may have moral benefits (Hakemulder, 2000; Nussbaum, 1990), enhance and deepen our sense of self (Sikora, Kuiken & Miall, 2011), make us think about who we would (not) want to become in the future (Richardson & Eccles, 2007), foster our empathy (Bal & Veltkamp, 2013), and reduce prejudices toward others (Johnson, 2013).

While in educational settings the areas of philosophy and citizenship education may traditionally attend to these topics, literature teaching may do so as well. Reader response theorists (e.g., Rosenblatt, 1978) have argued that during literary reading, readers may vividly experience what happens to characters, imagining their thoughts and emotions in a particular situation. This ‘simulation of social experience’ (Mar & Oatley, 2008) may result in enhanced understandings of both ourselves and others.

Despite a large body of research on reader response practices and the literature classroom as an authentic social space, relatively little attention has been paid to what students take away from literary reading for their lives beyond the book and beyond the classroom. Current pressing questions concern how reader response instruction and other pedagogical approaches may connect ‘literary objectives’ (e.g., interpretative skills, literary competence, literary-historical knowledge) to personally and socially oriented objectives, in particular in a time when testing and assessment may partly determine the curricula in language arts classrooms (Applebee & Langer, 2011).

In this symposium, the SIG ROLE aims at exploring how the literature classroom may offer students, through literary reading and developing their literary skills and competencies, the opportunity to experience and reflect on personal and social changes that literary reading may bring about.

References
Applebee, A. N., & Langer, J. A. (2011). "EJ" Extra: A Snapshot of Writing Instruction in Middle Schools and High Schools. The English Journal, 100(6), 14-27.
Bal, M., & Veltkamp, M. (2013). How does Fiction Reading Influence Empathy? An Experimental Investigation on the Role of Emotional Transportation. Plos One, 8, 1-12.
Hakemulder, F. (2000). The Moral Laboratory: Experiments Examining the Effects of Reading Literature on Social Perception and Moral Self-knowledge. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Johnson, D.R. (2013). Transportation Into Literary Fiction Reduces Prejudice Against and Increases Empathy for Arab-Muslims. Scientific Study of Literature, 3(1), 77-92.
Mar, R. A., & Oatley, K. (2008). The Function of Fiction is the Abstraction and Simulation of Social Experience. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(3), 173-192.
Nussbaum, M. C. (1990). Love’s Knowledge. Essays on Philosophy and Literature. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Richardson, P.W., & Eccles, J.S. (2007). Rewards of Reading: Toward the Development of Possible Selves and Identities. International Journal of Educational Research, 46(6), 341-356
Rosenblatt, L. M. (1978). The Reader, the Text, the Poem. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Sikora, S., Kuiken, D., & Miall, D. S. (2011). Expressive Reading: A Phenomenological Study of Readers’ Experience of Coleridge’s ‘The Rime of the Ancient Mariner’. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(3), 258-268.